|
|
Youngs
Wimbledon Cup 2007 - 22-25 March
Men & Women |
Wimbledon Squash & Fitness Club | Phil Rushworth | 020 8947 5806 |
|
 |
|
25-Mar, Finals:
[1] Laura Lengthorn bt [3/4] Rebecca
Macree 11/7, 11/8, 12/10
[1] Peter Barker bt [2] Azlan Iskandar
11/9, 11/7, 7/11, 11/8
|
|
24-Mar, Semi-Finals:
[1] Laura Lengthorn bt [5/8] Emma
Beddoes 8/11, 11/7,
11/4, 11/5
[3/4] Rebecca Macree bt [2] Dom Lloyd-Walter
4/11, 11/4, 4/11, 11/9, 11/7
[1] Peter Barker bt Daryl Selby
9/11, 11/6, 11/1, 11/6
[2] Azlan Iskandar bt Bradley Ball
8/11, 10/12, 11/5, 11/5, 11/5
Macree makes Wimbledon final
She may have retired from the WISPA circuit, but Rebecca Macree
showed she is still a more than handy player as she beat second seed
Dominique Lloyd-Walter to reach the final of the Young's Wimbledon Cup.
Macree, champion here in 2005, faces top seed and defending champion
Laura Lengthorn in Sunday's final in a repeat of last year's
semi-final.
In the men's event it's top seeds Peter Barker and Azlan
Iskandar - world numbers 17 and 19 - who will contest the final after
both recovered from deficits in their semi-finals.
|
|

 |
|
Lengthorn & Handley
claim
Youngs Cup
Rebecca Colthup reports
The crowds here at Wimbledon were treated to two
great finals ...
[2] Laura Lengthorn bt [3/4]
Carla Khan
9/3, 9/4, 9/2 (25m) |
Laura goes one better ...
Both players started well, with some tight long rallies. However Laura soon
started to dominate, she kept Carla in the back corners and then, with her
opponent behind her she won the rallies with beautifully weighted drops and
boasts.
Carla tried in vain to have the game played at the fast, hard pace that she
enjoys but Laura was having none of that and she controlled the match from
start to finish with a good variety of lengths and touch shots.
Laura won 9/3 9/4 9/2 in 25 minutes to become Wimbledon champion, going one
better than her runner-up spot last year.
[3/4] Scott Handley bt [3/4]
Peter Genever
11/9, 11/2, 13/11 (38m) |
First title for Scott ...
The game started with an epic rally that seemed to last forever. Scott looked
determined, a man on a mission!! He moved Peter around the court, took the
ball early and put Peter under pressure. Peter tried to get in front of Scott
and when he did he played some superb winners.
The first game was very close with both players hitting a series of winners
and a couple of errors but at 9-9 Peter made two mistakes to hand the game to
Scott 11/9.
Right from the word go in the second game Scott picked up the pace and forced
Peter into hitting six errors and with Scott hitting five drop shot winners he
soon took the game 11/2. The third game was a lot closer, both players had
their chances.
Peter tried to slow the game down and cut out the errors and Scott tried to
keep Peter under pressure with the fast pace and tight drops.
They exchanged match and game balls but it was Scott who capitalised on a
mistake to win the game 11/10 (3-1) and the match 3-0 to pick up the Wimbledon
trophy for the first time.
This is Rebecca Colthup for SquashSite
at the Wimbledon Cup, signing off >>>>>>>>
|




|
18-Mar:
Seeds Suffer in Youngs Semis
The top seeds for the Youngs Wimbledon Cup all came safely through their
lunchtime semi-finals at Wimbledon Racquets & Fitness Club, but the evening
semi-finals saw three upset results as Scott Handley and Peter
Genever came through to the men's final, while in the women's event
Carla Khan beat top seed Pamela Nimmo to set up a meeting with Laura
Lengthorn, who reversed last year's final as she defeated defending
champion Rebecca Macree ...
Men's Semi-Finals:
[3/4] Scott Handley bt [1] Joey Barrington
11/9, 7/11, 11/8, 4/4 rtd (45m)
[3/4] Peter Genever bt [2] Stacey Ross
9/11, 7/11, 11/9, 11/6, 11/3 (62m)
Women's Semi-Finals:
[3/4] Carla Khan bt [1] Pamela Nimmo
8/10, 9/5, 9/7, 9/3 (63m)
[2] Laura Lengthorn bt [3/4] Rebecca Macree 9/7, 9/4, 4/9, 9/5
(53m)
|
|
Drama
at Wimbledon
Rebecca Colthup reports ...
Good morning squash site readers,
Last nights semi finals were full of drama, tension and unfortunately a few
arguments!! |



"I though that I had lost it in third, Stacey was playing really well.
Half way through the third I decided that I had nothing to lose and hit
two winners to get myself back into the game.
"I slowed the pace and relaxed and started to grow in confidence. I
started hitting some winners and Stacey started to look at little
nervous.
"I am pleased to get though and I am looking forward tomorrow’s final."
Peter Genever |

"Peter played well and in the third when he hit two winners I started to
get jittery. I am very disappointed not to get through to the final.
"I haven’t played enough recently and I lost my concentration."
Stacey Ross |

"I am really pleased to get through to the final. I knew that Joey was
injured so I tried to move him around the court but at times I played
too short too soon and he was able to put me under pressure.
"I am looking forward to tomorrow’s final, Peter and I have played each
other many times, it should be a good game."
Scott Handley |
|
|
The first
semi final on court was Pam Nimmo against Carla Khan.
I missed the first 15 minutes of the game and when I joined the match it was
only three all in the first, the game was very scrappy and we had decision
after decision. Carla was the first to get into her stride and soon found
herself 8-6 ahead. Pam saved the first two game balls and pulled it back to
8-7 but when she conceded the serve with another error she threw her racket
with considerable force against the side wall which quite rightly bought a
conduct warning from the referee.
Carla couldn’t convert the four game balls she had and two errors handed the
first game to Pam 10-8. Pam was finding the going very tough, Carla was
playing a very fast pace and forcing Pam into making the errors.
Pam was struggling with her backhand and gave away far too many stokes
throughout the match. She kept informing the audience that ‘today just wasn’t
her day’ With things not going Pam’s way she began to argue with the referee
at every decision and during the fourth there was an ugly confrontation on
court with Pam telling Carla exactly what she thought of her!! Not something
that I thought I would see on a squash court.
Carla to her credit didn’t get involved and she didn’t let it phase her and
ran out the winner to reach her first Wimbledon Cup final.
[3/4] Carla Khan bt [1] Pamela Nimmo
8/10, 9/5, 9/7, 9/3 (63m)
|
|
The next match on court was
Laura Lengthorn and Rebecca Macree.
Rebecca retired from the circuit 13 months ago and at times he lack of
competitive match play showed, she was often just that half a yard off the
pace but she still has some great shots. It took Laura some time to get used
to Rebecca’s unorthodox game but eventually took the first 9-7.
Laura then got into her stride and had Rebecca constantly on the backfoot and
she took the second 9-4. Rebecca decided to resort to arguing with the referee
and asking for absolutely everything, this unsettled Laura and she lost her
concentration and Rebecca won the third 9-4.
The amount of energy that Rebecca had used to win the third soon took its
toll. Rebecca even tried to leave the court to argue with the referee, it was
more for a breather than anything else!! Laura kept her cool and won the
fourth 9-5 to take the match 3-1.
[2] Laura Lengthorn bt [3/4] Rebecca Macree
9/7, 9/4, 4/9, 9/5
(53m) |
|
The
third mach on court was between Stacey Ross and Peter Genever.
There wasn’t much to choose between the two players tonight. Both players
looked relaxed and played some superb squash.
Genever took an early lead in the first but at 9-8 Stacey played three
outright winners to take the game 11-9. Stacey looked very positive in third,
playing the game with consistent accuracy. He opened up an early lead, which
Peter couldn’t close. 11-7.
Stacy started the third full of confidence and quickly found himself 7-2 up
and looked the most likely winner. But Peter wasn’t ready to conced the match,
he did what he does best, he dug deep, cut out any errors and made himself
very difficult to break down.
Stacey became frustrated by his lack of opportunities and suddenly we were at
9-9, a forehand crosscourt nick and Peter was 10-9 ahead, he took the game at
the first attempt. The start of the fourth was very close, both player varying
the pace, playing some beautiful winners that were appreciated by the crowd.
From 6-6 Peter took control of the match taking the next five points to secure
the fourth 11-6. Now there looked like only one winner – Peter, all the
momentum was with him. Genever raced into a 5-0 lead and never really looked
back, taking the final game 11-3. What a comeback.
[3/4] Peter Genever bt [2] Stacey Ross
9/11, 7/11, 11/9, 11/6, 11/3 (62m)
|
|
The final match of the day was
between Joey Barrington and Scott Handley.
The momentum of this match kept swinging between the two players. Joey race
into a 6-1 lead, playing a series of superb winners, Scott weathered the storm
and replied with a series of winners of his own to pull it back to 9-7. Joey
made a couple of unforced errors and Scott took the first 11-9.
The second started the same as the first Joey raced into 6-0 lead and again
Scott came back but this time Joey had a big enough lead to take the game
11-7. I called time to get the players back on to court for the start of
third, Joey was a little slow and I reminded him that he needs to be on court
when I call time to which he replied ‘are you a school teacher?’ to which I
relied ‘in a previous life!’
This bought a smile to Joey’s face, he had been struggling with injury and a
times during the match had looked in considerable discomfort so it was good to
see him smile.
The injury started to take its toll on Joey and it was Scott’s turn to race
into an early lead. Joey did all he could to try and reel Scott back in but
Scott took the game 11-8.
I have to admit to a bit of a blooper during the third, Joey asked for a let
to which I gave my decision, stroke to Handley!! A member of the audience
shouted ‘school teacher!!’ Whoops, it had been a long day. Both players
laughed and I went more than a litle red!!
The start of the fourth was very close. At 4-3 Scott played a forehand boast,
Joey lunged for the ball and slipped, almost doing the splits. This aggravated
the groin injury that he had been carrying throughout the match and although
he did try to play on the injury forced him to retire at 4-4.
The match was played in a great spirit and it was a shame that it ended this
way and I wish Joey a speedy recovery.
[3/4] Scott Handley bt [1] Joey Barrington
11/9, 7/11, 11/8, 4/4 rtd (45m)
|
|
Ok ... fff
to the finals now .... speak to you later !!!
Rebecca Colthup |
|
Youngs Cup
Quarters
Rebecca Colthup reports ...
Dear Squashsite readers,
With
Fram away in Melbourne the job of covering the Youngs Wimbledon Cup in her
absence has fallen to me! I have to say that journalism isn’t really my thing
but I will give it a go!
This morning saw the quarter final matches, I was refereeing on one court and
Malc Whitley the other, so I can only really report on the matches I marked. |
[3/4] Rebecca Macree bt Harriet
Ingham
9/2, 9/0, 9/1 (12m) |

I feel that I played well considering I haven’t played any tournaments for 13
months. I was hitting the ball and moving around the court well. I am looking
forward to tonight’s match against Laura, I want to see how I handle the
pressure of a tough match… it’s been a while!
Rebecca Macree

I feel that I played
well, its very good experience to get on court with Rebecca. The match has
shown me the areas of the game that I need to work on with my coach Stephen
Meads.
Harriet Ingham
Fantastic …. Harriet played very well, she has improved a lot this season and
I think that is down to her playing for our club's ladies team.
Mrs Ingham

I was disappointed not
to win the 3rd, I had my chances but didn’t take them. I feel that I am
playing well at the moment, I have been trying to get a good balance between
the long and short game and not giving away cheap points by going short to
soon. On the whole I have had a good tournament, I had a good result last
night so I can’t complain.
Phil Rushworth
[1] Pam Nimmo bt
Leonie Holt
9/3, 9/1, 9/1 (16m) |
[1] Joey Barrington bt
Tom Richards
11/8, 11/5, 11/6 (38m) |

[2] Stacey Ross bt
Tim Vail
4/11, 11/9, 11/6, 11/6 (41m) |
|
[3/4] Carla Khan bt Rachel
Willmott
9/2, 9/0, 9/2 (19m) |
The first
match on court was Carla Khan and Rachel Wilmott. The match
started at an amazing pace with both payers keen to stamp their authority on
the match.
Rachel started the better of the two and crept into the lead with some
precision lengths and drops but Carla wasn’t ready to let Rachel dictate the
pace and soon got into her stride. She had Rachel doing all the running and
sure enough the pressure told and a few errors started creeping into to
Rachel’s game. 3-0 to Carla.
"I
am pleased with how I played, it was quite a comfortable win in the end.
I have been out for 6 months through illness so it’s really good to get
back paying in competitive matches.
"Rachel has lots of potential and will be someone to watch out for in
the future."
Carla Khan |
|
[2] Laura Lengthorn bt Claire
Kidd
9/1, 9/2, 9/2 (19m) |
Next on Court was Laura
Lengthorn, last year's runner up, hoping for one better this year and
Claire Kidd.
This match was completely different to the first, both players played some
precision lengths and wonderful touch shots. Laura was the stronger player and
after a close early exchange her strength and variety told. 3-0 to Laura.
"I
think I played well but Laura is a lovely player.
It was a very tough match, she had me moving all round the court and the
pressure told and I got tired in the third and couldn’t retrieve her
boasts.
Claire Kidd |
|
[3/4] Peter Genever bt Phil
Rushworth
12/10, 4/11, 14/12, 11/4 (41m)
|
The next
match I marked was Phil Rushworth, our club pro and Peter Genever.
Phil is a very tenacious player and battled throughout the first game to build
up a lead but Peter hung in there and despite being 10-8 down he played two
great rallies to pull it back to 10-10, tiebreaker. Phil didn’t play the tie
breaker very well and made two errors to hand the game to Peter. All that
effort and then he sticks it in the tin!! The second game was a total
contrast, Phil attacked played the ball early, moved his opponent around the
court and won the rallies with a series of unretrievable drop shots. 1-1.
The third game was where the match was won. Phil carried on where he left off
and raced into a 9-4 lead but Peter wasn’t to be easily beaten and dug deep
forcing Phil into several errors. 10 – 10 The tiebreaker was fiercely
contested with Peter complaining that Phil wasn’t clearing the ball but to be
honest it was 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. Peter was the stronger
player in the tiebreak and won it 14-12. The fourth was one sided with Peter
in full control winning it 11-4.
"I
was quite lucky to win the game, Phil played really well.
"I didn’t feel relaxed at all through out the game.
"In the third I knew that I just needed to hang in there and I would
win, which I did so I’m pleased."
Peter Genever |
|
[3/4] Scott Handley bt Steve
Coppinger
11/9, 4/11, 11/6, 11/4 (37m) |
The last quarterfinal I refereed
was between Scott Handley and Steve (seriously tall!!)
Coppinger.
The first game was a close affair with both players trying to get the upper
hand, a couple of errors at a crucial point gave the game to Scott 11/9. Steve
then stepped up his game, started taking the ball early and dominating the mid
court. 11/4 to Steve 1-1.
I think Scott had enough of doing all the running in the 2nd that he slowed
the pace down in the 3rd, played straighter and tighter, not giving his
opponent the chance to take the ball early.
Now it was Steve doing all the running. 11-6 to Scott. The fourth continued in
the same vain with Scott dictating the pace of the game and with Steve running
out of energy the errors crept in and Scott ran out the winner 11/4.
"Steve is very strong around the T and
I let him get in front of me and take the ball early in the first two
games.
"In the third I changed my game and slowed things down a bit and stopped
going short too early in the rally. I started playing the ball
straighter to stop Steve dominating and it worked."
Scott Handley |
|
|
I have to
give a mention to Harriet Ingham who at 13 was our youngest competitor
by far! Harriet played Claire Baker, tournament organiser in the first round
and won, what a result!! Harriet played really well and Claire found that
Harriet was not a player to be under estimated! One to watch for the future I
think.
Anyway, I have got to go and referee the Semi finals but I will keep you up to
date with everything that has been going on here at Wimbledon.
Rebecca Colthup |

Men's Draw & Results |

Women's Draw & Results |
Men's Qualifying,
Thu 17th:
Issa Kamara v Steve London
11/7 7/11 11/9 11/9
Richard Birks v Andre Texeira
11/4 11/6 12/10
Dean Newberry v Mike Knight
5/11 5/11 10/12
Asa Morris v Chris Tasker-Grindley 11/8 4/11 4/11
3/11
Humberto Mesquita v Nick Peters
9/11 11/5 11/4 8/11 11/6
Steve Coppinger v Steffan Morgan 11/3 11/3
11/2
Simon Taylor v Jamie Mathews
11/9 8/11 11/9 9/11 9/11 (49mins)
Matt Holland v Andrew Birks
11/9 5/11 11/2 9/11 11/13 (50mins)
Ryan Thompson v Sam Smith
11/5 11/7 11/4 (21 mins)
Will Newman v Tom Power
3/11 9/11 11/8 12/10 7/11 (46mins)
Lewis Walters v Rory Pennel
12/10 14/12 9/11 11/7 (53 mins)
Joe Lee v Temo Gomez
11/9 11/7 11/5 (23 mins)
Peter Creed v Neil Hitchens
12/14 12/14 8/11
Phil Nightingale v Will Hoy
11/6 11/5 11/3 (20mins)
Mike Pearson v Rhodri Hughes
11/7 10/12 12/10 8/11 14/12
Neil Baker v Eddie Charlton
11/8 5/11 8/11 11/7 12/10
|
|