



















|
15-Feb, Day SIX:
MASTERS SEMIS
Semi-Finals
[3/4] Madeline Perry 3-1 [1] Laura Massaro 6-11,
12-10, 11-9, 11-6 (55m)
[2] Alison Waters 3-1 [3/4] Jenny Duncalf
5-11, 11-6, 11-2, 12-10 (58m)
[1] Nick Matthew 3-1 [3/4] Daryl Selby
8-11, 11-8, 11-6, 11-9 (84m)
[2] James Willstrop 3-0 [3/4] Adrian Grant
11-5, 11-9, 11-8 (62m)
follow on TWITTER | photos
& videos GALLERY
Defending champions through to finals
as Madeline makes it at last
While the men’s final will be a repeat of the last two years
between the top two seeds Nick Matthew and James Willstrop,
defending women’s champion Alison Waters will face a first-time
finalist after Ireland’s Madeline Perry broke a spell of six
losing semi-finals by beating top seed Laura Massaro.
[2] Alison Waters 3-1
[3/4] Jenny Duncalf 5-11, 11-6, 11-2, 12-10 (58m)
Waters through to 8th final
“And
I’m only 29,” said a delighted Alison Waters after reaching her
8th Nationals final with a 3-1 win over Jenny Duncalf.
Considering the pair had already contested three Nationals
finals - Duncalf winning two of them - a close match was to be
expected, and that’s what we got.
Duncalf
was on top in the early stages, capitalising on a 3-0 lead and
playing confidently as she took the game 11-5. Waters fought
back though, and moved ahead from 3-all in the second to level
the match 11-6 before dominating the third 11-2 to take the
lead.
Duncalf looked to be taking it to a decider, moving ahead from
3-all to lead 6-3, but Waters fought back to level at 6-all.
Duncalf moved ahead again, getting two game balls at 10-8 as
Waters tinned two attempted dropshots.
Those
were the last errors the defending champion made though, as she
took the next four points to close out the match and move into
yet another final.
“Jenny played really well,” said Waters, “she came out firing
and really put me on the back foot at the start.
“In the second and third I knew I had to try to step up, volley
more and put her under pressure, but then in the fourth she came
back again.
“At 10-8 down I told myself I really didn’t want a fifth, so
really pushed to finish it off there and then.
“I’ve got three titles to my name and I want more – so can’t
wait for tomorrow!” she added.
Video of the first game
[1] Nick Matthew 3-1
[3/4] Daryl Selby 8-11, 11-8, 11-6, 11-9
(84m)
and a seventh for Matthew
Nick
Matthew made it through to a seventh National final in a row (he
was out injured for 07 and 08) with an especially hard-fought
four-game win over Daryl Selby, who was the last player to beat
Matthew in this event in the 2011 final.
The defending champion had the slight edge in the first, but
from 7-8 down Selby put in some exceptional rallies to take the
lead 11-8.
The
second was equally tight, but from 8-all it was Matthew who
pulled clear this time to level 11-8, and he then went on to
control the third, taking it 11-6.
Selby was back in business in the fourth, leading 7-3, but as
Matthew started to peg that lead back the play became rather
scrappy with the referees involved more than anyone would like.
Matthew edged ahead 9-7 with Selby unhappy at a couple of no
lets, but that seemed to fire him up as he levelled at 9-all.
A
stroke as Selby failed to clear from the side wall brought up
match ball, and a fluffed dropshot off Selby’s toes ended the
match after 84 minutes.
Matthew’s post-match interview to the crowd was slightly marred
as one spectator decided to boo the world no.1. In response
Matthew told the crowd: “To the person that booed, I’d like
to see how they would react under so much pressure on there.
“It
was getting a bit physical out there,” admitted Matthew, “and
the referees were involved more than we’d like.
“I still have fresh memories of him beating me in the final a
couple of years ago, I really didn’t want it to go to a fifth as
that would have tipped the scales in his favour again, so I was
pleased to be able to finish it off in four. Hopefully
tomorrow’s final will be a cleaner match."
“It’s the semi-finals and emotions and passion obviously run
high," said Selby. "I felt like I got some poor decisions in the
fourth and it turned the tables. It’s hard to take when you’re
on there slogging your guts out, training hard throughout the
year.”
Video of the first game
[3/4] Madeline Perry 3-1 [1]
Laura Massaro 6-11, 12-10, 11-9, 11-6 (55m)
Madeline makes it at last
They’ve contested the
semi-finals in each of the last three years, and last year it
was 12-10 in the fifth, so a close match between Laura Massaro
and Madeline Perry was to be expected.
The
first game went point for point un to 6-all, then Massaro,
two-time champion and top seed, pulled clear to take the lead
11-6.
Perry, playing in her seventh sem-final in eight years and yet
to win one, did much the same from the middle of the second,
couldn’t capitalise on two game balls at 10-8 but after Massaro
had levelled it was the 14-time Irish champion who found two
crisp winners to level 12-10.
Both
players looked a little edgy, with the odd error mixed in with
patient rallying, but again in the third it was Perry who
finished better, taking three points in a row from 7-all.
Massaro pulled two back but then hit the tin as Perry took a 2-1
advantage.
The upset - the first one of the tournament - was on the cards,
even more so when Perry took a 7-0 lead in the fourth. Massaro
managed to lengthen the rallies, and got back to 5-8, but a
return of serve kill by Perry, a lob that drifted out from
Massaro brough up five match balls.
Perry needed only two, and as she played a final dropshot she
raised her arm in triumph - Madeline had finally made the final.
“I
wasn’t very comfortable in the first round on the other courts,”
said Perry, “but I felt good on here in yesterday’s match and I
think I played well today. I came close to Laura a couple of
weeks ago in Cleveland, so I knew I could win, but even at 7-0,
8-1 in the fourth I knew that she’s quite capable of coming
back.
“I’m trying to stay calm, as I’ve got a final to play tomorrow,”
added the delighted winner. “I’m 37, so it’s about time!
Video of the first game
[2] James Willstrop 3-0
[3/4] Adrian Grant 11-5, 11-9, 11-8 (62m)
Willstrop sets up repeat final
The
men’s final will be a repeat of the last two editions after
James Willstrop came through a tough three-game encounter with
Adrian Grant.
Two-time champion Willstrop was quicker out of the blocks,
taking an early lead and consolidating to take the first 11-5
after 15 minutes. Grant was still struggling to get on terms as
Willstrop forged ahead to 6-2, but Grant’s annoyed reaction to
his own unforced errors told us he wasn’t finished yet.
Working
hard, Grant pulled back to 7-8 , Willstrop got three game balls
but Grant saved two of them only to volley into the tin on the
third, 11-9 in 21 minutes.
Grant made a better start to the third, but Willstrop always
manged to stay a point or two ahead, and from 7-6 he again had
three match balls at 10-7 as Grant missed a volley.
On the next rally Grant powered the ball deep then collapsed in
a heap as Willstrop caught him in the ribs on the way past. That
was a no let, but Willstrop finished it off on the next rally to
move into a seventh final, and a third in a row against Matthew.
“I
had to plot my way through that one,” said Willstrop, “it was a
good quality match, a bit of a chess game really trying to find
the right areas to put the ball into.
“Adrian’s a great athlete and he plays well here, I knew all of
that so that’s a very good win for me.
“You can’t fail to get yourself up for a match like tomorrow’s
final against Nick. There’s no pressure on me, I’m about 800 to
one down, but I may not have too many of these occasions left so
I’ll try to enjoy it and make the most of it.”
Video of the first game
|