|
Thu 24th
- Day FOUR, Round TWO |
Round TWO:
[1] Amr Shabana (Egy) bt [12]
Adrian Grant (Eng)
10/12, 11/2, 11/2, 11/5 (45m)
[14] Ong Beng Hee (Mas) bt
Cameron Pilley (Aus)
11/2, 7/11, 11/9, 9/11, 11/9 (108m)
[3] Gregory Gaultier (Fra)
bt [13] Olli Tuominen (Fin)
11/5, 11/5, 11/3 (30m)
[7] Karim Darwish
(Egy) bt [16] Laurens Jan Anjema (Ned)
9/11, 11/7, 11/8, 11/5 (58m)
[6] Thierry Lincou (Fra) bt
[15] Azlan Iskandar (Mas)
12/10, 5/11, 11/9, 7/11, 11/3 (77m)
[4] James Willstrop (Eng) bt
[9] Peter Barker (Eng)
10/12, 11/5, 11/13, 11/8, 11/9 (105m)
[10] Lee Beachill (Eng) bt [5]
David Palmer (Aus)
11/7, 13/11, 11/9 (55m)
[2] Ramy Ashour (Egy) bt [Q] Tarek
Momen (Egy)
11/5, 11/7, 11/7 (32m) |
EN BREF
Issue #1: Surprise Racket,
Refs in Force, Glorious Food, Change of Scenery |
Thu 24th - Day FOUR
Fram & Steve report from the Kuwait Open ... |
A loooong session ...
So much for scheduling matches at 45-minute intervals - after
the first hour of play both opening matches were locked at
one-game-all, 9-all.
Both higher seeds, Thierry Lincou and Ong Beng Hee,
took 1/0 and then 2/1 leads, but both 'challengers', Azlan
Iskandar and Cameron Pilley, battled back to level force
deciders.
The fifth games were very different though as Lincou breezed
through 11/3 while Ong had to battle all the way - ten lets at
8-all, 5 lets at 9-all - before edging home with a pair of low
crosscourt drives.
The second pair of matches were also contrasting, as James
Willstrop and Peter Barker got themselves embroiled in a
gruelling five-setter while Karim Darwish and LJ Anjema
locked horns in a more attacking contest, the Egyptian coming
from a game down to win in just under the hour. Willstrop
maintained his long unbeaten run, twice coming from behind to
win in 105 minutes.
The final match on the outside courts produced a massive upset
as Lee Beachill beat double-world champion David Palmer
in three tough games.
The first match on the glass court also finished in three, but
Gregory Gaultier had a much easier time as he eased past
Olli Tuominen in half an hour.
Top Egyptian duo Amr Shabana and Ramy Ashour
finished off the round. Shabana looked a little tentative in the
first game against Adrian Grant, but visibly upped the pace
thereafter. Ashour never looked in trouble as he ended the
qualifying run of compatriot Tarek Momen.
Quarter-finals start at 18.00 on Friday ...
|
|
|
[6]
Thierry Lincou (Fra) bt [15]
Azlan Iskandar (Mas)
12/10, 5/11, 11/9, 7/11, 11/3 (77m)
TIGHT
When
in the car coming to the venue, I asked James at what time he
was playing, he says “1.45”. He said. But when he told me that
he came right after Thierry and Azlan, I told him straight off
“nope, you won’t be playing at 1.45, James, that ain’t going to
happen”. And I was right. Those two great accuracy players
battled away 77m, and for ive games, stunning games.
Actually, I never realised how close Thierry and Azlan’s styles
were. They so like they tight game, so like to volley drop,
their best shot, backhand drop shot, they are both good
retrievers, and they are both “rallies constructors”, like chess
players. Azlan is better at the counter-attacking though, and
Thierry is that much more patient.
It was a festival of TitiTight shots, as Shabana calls it, as in
some great drives, they both moved each other around, trying
their best to prevent the openings of their opponent, retrieved
astonishingly, and made overall very few errors, except in the
fourth for the Frenchman, where he made six errors in like eight
shots.
At 2/2, it was absolutely impossible to pick a winner, and it’s
only in the middle of the fifth, after yet again some two
extremely fast pace, long and disputed rallies, that Azlan just
snapped mentally, stopping running, and virtually offered
Thierry the game on a golden platter.
He’s
got great length, he is fast as a flash, and he likes to volley.
In other words, he likes doing everything I like doing! Today,
it was all about who had the control, the ascendancy of the T.
In the fourth, my focus just went out of the window, I guess
that as the rallies were pretty gruelling, I may have had a drop
in the energy level, and the head just went.
And whereas for the fifth, we had two very hard rallies in the
middle of the game, that he both lost, and that’s very hard on
the mental, I guess it must have hurt him a lot mentally..
I feel we produced a good match, and I’m glad to be in the
quarters. I’m in need of some matches, I feel.
|
Thierry is such a great ambassador
for the game, I’ve known him since I’m very young, and we’ve
both got the same strength, the backhand drop shot. But I felt
that if I had a lot of plays today, if I was able to set up the
rallies, and give myself the opportunity, when it came to play
the shot, play the volley, I just hesitated. And you can’t do
that. You’ve got to play the ball, and that’s it, do what’s got
to be done.
In the 5th, I got a bit excited, and stopped producing the work
that was needed. And against Thierry, or against anybody of that
level, you just can’t do that, becoming very negative, and not
doing the work… And then, I tried to stay positive, but once he
gets into a rhythm, he is like me, he is very hard to break…
|
|
[14]
Ong Beng Hee (Mas) bt Cameron
Pilley (Aus)
11/2, 7/11, 11/9, 9/11, 11/9 (108m)
Bengy Survives ... just
Steve Reports
When Ong Beng Hee took a very quick game against an out-of-sorts
Cameron Pilley, who just wasn't at the races, not many would
have predicted a 100-minute-plus epic, but that's what we got.
It wasn't until he was 5/2 down in the second that the
Australian came to life. He pulled back to level at 6-all then
eased ahead to take the game, helped by a few Malaysian tins.
Another quick start to the third from Bengy, 3/0, followed by
three errors and the first visible signs of frustration with
himself. Cameron capitalised, taking an 8/4 lead but Bengy
refocused, and retook the lead.
To cut a long story short, Cameron held a slender lead
throughout the fourth, then it was close all the way through the
fifth up to 8-all. They were tired now, unsurprisingly, and if
Bengy thought he might have earned earned a stroke at some point
over the next few rallies, at least the referees were consistent
as they awarded ten consecutive lets.
The deadlock was broken with a cross-court volley drop by the
Malaysian, Cameron levelled with a drop of his own, then at
9-all we had another five lets. At this rate we were heading for
a two-hour match, but then Bengy produced two lovely backhand
flicks, leaving Cameron for dead just as they had done in the
first game an hour and a half ago ... some match ...
"I'm
working hard for my money these days!
"He was a bit heavy at the start, and at 5/2 in the second I
lost focus, which is the biggest thing with me. I'd like to
thank Omar [Abdel Aziz] for all his help in between games. He
sat and watched for two hours, and I lost focus a lot of times,
I was under a lot of pressure from Cameron, but Omar really
helped me pull it back together when I needed it.
"To finish with those two backhand flicks, well they could
easily have gone down and that would have been the match to him,
so I just thank my luck on those ones today.
"Ten games and three hours play in two matches – I'm ready for
revenge on Shabana!"
|
"Brutal,
absolutely brutal.
"I really felt up for the match, but he was a lot sharper than
me at the start. It was just a grind to win the games I won, but
considering how I was feeling I'm fairly pleased to have pushed
him that close. Sometimes you just have to play like that, but
it's not pretty to watch.
"He hadn't played one of his flicks for a game and a half, and
then at 9-all he plays probably his best two of the match …"
Foot repairs needed for tomorrow ... |
|
[4]
James Willstrop (Eng) v [9]
Peter Barker (Eng)
10/12, 11/5, 11/13, 11/8, 11/9 (105m)
BATTLE OF ENGLAND
Oh. My. God.
Mentally, Peter had a slight advantage I thought today. Having
nothing to lose against his team mate, on a traditional court,
Peter started extremely well, showing his firm intention to win
the encounter, attacking at the right time, with the right shot.
But hey, James didn’t come to Kuwait to lose in the second
round, and even after losing the first game on the tie-break, he
cruised through the second one, but took a terrible start in the
third, to find himself down in no time 8/2.
Peter
is going to finish this one quickly, we thought. We couldn’t
have been more wrong. It took 44 minutes to Peter and six game
balls – he became a bit defensive at that point, and seemed to
forget how he got to that point - from 10/5 to eventually 13/11,
to take what should have been the turning point of the match.
And when James came back in the fourth, he was white as a sheet,
tired both mentally and physically. Peter took advantage of it,
to take the lead, 5/2. Yet again, we thought well, this is it,
James is cooked and well done.
That maybe was the case, but did the Pontefract Golden Boy
showed guts and determination there, taking the game 11/8, and
somehow, breaking his team mate spirit on the way. We could see
at the end of that game, how frustrated, and how sad Peter was,
to have let go of such an opportunity…
But now, it was up to Peter to show his character. And yes he
was disappointed, and yes, he was tired, very very tired, but he
fought back, and like James, attacked, retrieved, run, both
defending their space and showing their skills both at the
front, and on the side walls…
At ever, at 9/9, it’s a flip of a coin, isn’t it? Today, the
coin fell on James' side. But on a personal note, this was a
stunning match, played by two gentlemen, who both showed some
superb talent, guts, and panache.
"Today
I had an opportunity to go 2/1, and feel good about it, and get
a momentum from it. But by the time I got there… it took me too
much energy.
"To give him credit, it was a hard game of squash he dug in more
than I did…
"It’s frustrating, because you’ve got to attack him, but not
opening the court too much.
"But it’s only a game of squash…"
|
So much for saving energy…
If there’s any difference between the top 8, and the top 16, I
guess it’s the experience of the big matches. And maybe that
today, it made a big difference.
I created a lot of belief in myself with my recent results, and
I’ve got to believe that I can get through those matches… But
it’s like treading water on there, it’s so much hard work,
especially on that court, which is like a leveller, although
playing Peter on any court would have been as hard as it was
today.
Peter had so much opportunity in the third, he was up 8/2, and
although I was hugely disappointed to lose the game, really
extremely disappointed, I thought that if he made me work hard,
I also put him through work.
Pete has improved so much recently, it’s getting more and more
difficult to beat him, and he is definitively going in the right
direction. And that proves what we were saying about it being so
tough to get rid of the top 16….
I’m so proud to be able to win a match like that, it’s got so
much more value to fight hard, and dig in against a player such
as Peter, and actually, getting through such a match. I’m so
happy, so proud…
|
|
[7]
Karim Darwish (Egy) bt [16]
Laurens Jan Anjema (Ned)
9/11, 11/7, 11/8, 11/5 (58m)
Darwish on the Attack
An
entertaining game to watch, two players intent on taking every
opportunity that presented itself, both adept at hard kills,
deceptive flicks and boasts, and both very, very good at
retrieving.
It wasn't all like that, of course, but it certainly wasn't one
of your up and down the wall chess matches.
On the day Karim Darwish was just better the game the both chose
to play. The Egyptian squandered a 7/4 lead in the first, but
apart from the first few rallies of the second he was never
behind again.
By the fourth game LJ was being pressured into taking too many
risks as Karim sped around court making some sensational
recoveries, often returning the shot with interest into the
nick.
|
"I
know he's a very good player, so I had to be aware, but I was a
bit sleepy in the first game, I was ahead for the whole game
then lost it, I should have won that one.
"After that I tried to make him move as much as I could, put it
into the corners. He has good shots but they're less effective
when you make him twist and turn. Towards the end of the third
he started to tire, and I took full control in the fourth.
"Les than an hour, that's good on these courts, so I'm pleased
to be going into the quarter-finals fresh …"
|
|
[10]
Lee Beachill (Eng) bt [5] David
Palmer (Aus)
11/7, 13/11, 11/9 (55m)
“DU
GRAND BEACHILL”
This could be called,
"Beachill Returns - He is back, and he is p. off."
I thought that PSA Vice President was in superb form today, I
very rarely saw him play better. Frankly, he didn’t give a
chance to a slow David, who seemed a bit lethargic, and never
really settled into the match.
But it may have something to do with Lee’s positive and sharp
game. Alert, fast to move, playing clever shots that wrong
footed the Australian so many times, and to be honest, it never
looked like the Englishman was going to lose this encounter.
Maybe it was a question of hunger for victory and motivation?
For David, it’s one more match to get to a quarter. But for Lee,
it was much more than that. To prove to the world, but most of
all to himself that he was still, as ever, a winner.
And a threat not to be ignored for the title…
I don’t think I
played that well today, it’s been a while since I’ve beaten a
top ten guy, I had a few hard 3/2, but I didn’t have such a win,
and you wouldn’t believe the confidence you get from a victory
like that.
Yesterday, I beat a very good player 3/0, unfortunately, nobody
will know about it, because my match was the only one not to get
any coverage…. But I feel I played better today. I think I play
around the top 10 level, and maybe a bit above today, and I’m
glad that I was able to prove that to myself.
I guess a win like that was on the cards for a little while now,
I’ve been hitting the ball very well recently, just not getting
the win. And very happy to be in the quarters of one the biggest
events in history…
|
"I felt good before the match, but
on the court, I felt as flat as possible, and so slow. I was
waiting for things to happen and not taking charge of things.
"A slow court, a slow match, I was just pushing the ball around
with no purpose. I guess I made so many unforced errors, because
I was so frustrated that the pace was so slow, I just was trying
to force the issue.
"It was pretty hard for me on there, I was trying to stay calm,
not to get frustrated with myself, but that didn’t work either!
Not to mention that we had so many lets, like 2/3 every rally,
impossible to get into any kind of rhythm. And if in the middle
of the second, I started to get more positive, at 10/10, I went
back to waiting for things to happen…
"One of the worst bad days at the office as possible. Not good,
not good."
|
|
[3]
Gregory Gaultier (Fra) bt
[13] Olli Tuominen (Fin)
11/5, 11/5, 11/3 (30m)
It was my first
time on the glass court, so I had to get used to it, take my
marks.
I didn’t play too badly, I was in control of most of the
rallies, which allowed me to create a few opening, and to finish
off the points.
Good thing is I’ll be fresh for my quarters tomorrow.
|
|
|
[1]
Amr Shabana (Egy) bt
[12] Adrian Grant (Eng)
10/12, 11/2, 11/2, 11/5 (45m)
In the first game,
I was a bit on the back foot, because Granty is so dangerous
when he is on the T. But after that, I made sure that the ball
stuck to the wall to prevent him from attacking. And I think
that he became a bit too anxious, and that’s why he made too
many unforced errors.
I was moving better and better as the match went on, but every
rally was tough, I had to make sure that I was on top of him
every time, because when he gets control of the rally, he never
let it go. I was never able to relax…
|
|
[2]
Ramy Ashour (Egy) bt [Q] Tarek
Momen (Egy)
11/5, 11/7, 11/7 (32m)
NEVER IN DOUBT BUT…
Ramy
was not really afraid of losing this match, and the first two
games didn’t do much to make him change his mind. But Tarek
suddenly found his rhythm, and his shots started to slide in
nicely, forcing Legend Ramy to run and run, and actually turned
the game on.
But as ever, Ramy is a chameleon, he adapts quickly to the level
of play he got to evolve at, and was able to apply that much
pressure back into the game, to take Tarek at his own style of
game, as in, stunning shots at the front.
And the crowd will be happy. They saw Ramy run, being under
pressure, a nice third game with excellent rallies and still,
the favourite finishes on top. Perfect evening for them…
Tonight,
I didn’t not play because my shots didn’t come in, but because I
just couldn’t see anything, not even my own shots! And that was
happening right from the warm up.
"Maybe the lighting is different from the traditional court, I
don’t know. And it’s not the first time I’m on the glass court,
it’s just the first time it happens to me.
And Ramy didn’t need that, did he???
|
Once
Tarek gets going, it’s impossible to stop him, you know. This
guy is an engineer, he doesn’t play squash all the time, and I
tell you, when he does, he is going to be awesome. Every time we
play – he comes and trains sometimes with me in my club – we
play very hard 5 setters.
But there’s one thing with him. If his shots go in, and they
work, it’s fine, but if they don’t go in, he is struggling! And
tonight, that’s what happened in the first two games, that were
really not hard for me at all
So I started relaxing, and that’s when he started playing really
well, and made it very hard for me. But on the glass court, you
play the shot, and it just goes in the right way, and comes out
with the right angle. It’s just wonderful..
|
|
|