|
30-Jul,
Quarter-Finals:
[1] James Willstrop bt Scott Handley
12/10, 11/6, 11/2
[3/4] Stewart Boswell bt Jaymie Haycocks 11/3, 11/5,
11/3
[3/4] Adrian Grant bt Chris Ryder
13/11, 11/8 , 11/9
[2] Daryl Selby bt Shaun Le-Roux
9/11, 11/4, 11/6, 11/4
31-Jul,
Semis:
[1] James Willstrop bt [3/4] Stewart Boswell
5/11, 11/8, 11/8,
11/9 (56m)
[2] Daryl Selby bt [3/4] Adrian Grant
15/13, 8/11, 6/11,
4/11 (78m)
13 and counting for Cleethorpes
Malcolm
Willstrop reports
The Cleethorpes Invitation
is in its 13th year of existence and amongst its winners are
such notables as John White, David Evans,
Mark Chaloner and Nick Taylor, the first winner
in 1998.
This year the current champion, James Willstrop, was
bidding for his 6th Cleethorpes title. The organisers were
rewarded with a powerful entry, which included Daryl
Selby, Adrian Grant and Stewart Boswell.
None were troubled to reach the semi-finals, so the line-up
was Willstrop v Boswell and Grant v Selby, all four heading
this week for the Australian Open and later for the the
Commonwealth Games.
Grant and Selby were first on, both looking as if match play
would do them good. Grant, having slightly the better of
things, won a protracted first game 12-10 and starting well
in the second, threatened a 2-0 lead. But Selby, aided by
some judiciously played angles, got back on level terms and
made it one game all. The match continued to be competitive,
but Selby, capitalising on forehand errors from Grant, led
2-1 and eventually won the match ,as Grant's resistance
lessened.
Feature of the match, refereed by John Massarella was that
there was only one stroke awarded, despite more than
frequent lets, asked for in the most part by Grant. He paid
for a seeming reluctance to play the ball, quite rightly,
although he was disgruntled, when Massarella refused him a
let when he chose not to play one of Selby's serves and it
was the world no.9 who took his place in the final for the
second year running.
The Willstrop Boswell match was a step-up from the first
semi final: Boswell had played the recent Malaysian Open and
was match fitter and Willstrop did not take long to get into
his stride. Boswell blitzed away to lead 9-1,playing
impressively and Willstrop remonstrated with one of his
frequent practice partners, asking him what he was doing
leading 9-1, when he, Willstrop, thought he was playing
well.
He was right, too, and he gradually fought back against
Boswell's onslaught, losing the first 11-5. The match
continued at a surprisingly high level and Willstrop won the
second 11-8 and then led 2-1,but with continued stern
resistance from Boswell. He won the fourth, too, a little
more comfortably to join Selby in the final, played
unusually later on the same day - no pleasant prospect!
Final:
[1] James Willstrop bt [2] Daryl Selby 11/2, 13/11, 11/2
(35m)
Willstrop retains title
With the Final on the same day, what happened in the earlier
semi finals was obviously of importance. The Selby- Grant
match was played first, was longer, but probably less
testing, since the quality of the Willstrop-Boswell match
was higher and the pace more exacting, but it did not seem
to have created any particular imbalance in terms of what it
took out of the players, which in the circumstances was a
good thing.
Willstrop began the final in style, dashing away to a 9-2
lead, the pace at which he was playing seeming too much for
Selby and he won it 11-2 with some ease.
Selby was not likely to lie down: that is not his style and
he is far too good a player these days. He is also resilient
and determined under pressure. Although Willstrop led 5-2
and 8-5 in the second Selby showed his quality to force a
tiebreak. He did not have a gameball, however and on his 5th
Willstrop clinched it.
He needed an injury break to attend to a neck problem and it
seemed unlikely that he could recover from 2-0 down, with
Willstrop continuing to dominate. He quickly asserted in the
third and won that 11-2,as he had the first.
All
four of the semi finalists will be happy to have had the
match play with so much coming up and Willstrop will be
delighted with the way he played, as will Boswell.
That Cleethorpes have sustained this event at such a high
level for so long is much to their credit and those
concerned should feel rewarded with the quality of player
they attract. The club is friendly and welcoming, as all
clubs should be, and the spectators are appreciative of the
players.
Mike and Kim Hallam, Brian and Julie Barrett
and Rick Havercroft and all those who back them in
any way deserve plaudits for their hard work and energy.
|







 |